Home | Features | Club Nights | Underwater Pics | Feedback | Non-Celebrity Diver | Events | 2 April 2025 |
Blog | Archive | Medical FAQs | Competitions | Travel Offers | The Crew | Contact Us | MDC | LDC |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
MEDICAL FAQs |
![]() |
Dive Medical questions & answers for common scuba diving conditions and illness provided in conjunction with the doctors at the London Diving Chamber and Midlands Diving Chamber. | |
All Categories » Respiratory Problems » Lungs (General)
QUESTION I read with interest your column in Sport Diver, and have a question for you.My father, sister and brother all have marked alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency(genetically predisposed deficiency of a protease inhibitor), predisposing them to emphysema. I have only a mild deficiency, and I have been diving for five years without problems, although I avoid technical diving. My question regards my younger brother, who is 17 years of age, and is in good general health and does not smoke. Is recreational scuba diving going to be contra-indicated for him, or is it reasonably safe to recommend him to take it up? Any advice would be greatly appreciated. ANSWER Alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency is one of the commoner genetic disorders but is still rarely found. Basically it is a lack of the protein of the same name which has the function of keeping in check another protein called neutrophil elastase. The purpose of this is to digest ageing lung cells or bacteria in the lung. The problem with neutrophil elastase is that once it gets going on these cells it will go on and destroy the healthy lung cells unless the alpha-1-antitrypsin is there to stop it. So people with a deficiency of this will go on and get permanent lung damage, called emphysema. QUESTION Can you confirm what range or percentages a normal result from a lung function test falls into. I've started doing a lot of yoga including breathing exercises and my most recent medical showed I was exhaling 115% of my predicted capacity. My yoga instructor has just done her open water training and her result read 170%. Does a higher than average lung function have any advantages or disadvantages when diving?ANSWER Big lungs are generally better for diving (less gas consumption, in theory) and you tend to find that people who dive regularly (such as commercial divers) get progressive increases in their FVC (forced vital capacity, which approximates to your total lung capacity). Most divers tend towards an increase in FVC with age but the general conclusion, that divers tend to have larger vital capacities than non-divers, was not confirmed by a study of 126 saturation divers by Thorsem et al (1989). They suggest that the increase is transient and that later there is a greater decline. Any change of vital capacity probably has little effect upon the diver’s general health.
QUESTION Hi Doc,I was first diagnosed with Synovial Sarcoma in '92, a 2cm lesion on external fascia of right rectus sheath. Broad excision completed Sep '92 No further treatment, but Scans for 5 years. In July 2004, noticed a lump in left thigh, CT of thorax showed huge mass in upper lobe of right lung. Resection of thigh lesion 13 Aug 04, Lobectomy Sep 04. Began 6 cycles of high dose Doxorubicin/Ifosfamide in Oct and completed Jan 05. Have discovered further lesions in right thigh, all those big enough to remove have been (2 weeks ago). No ongoing medication, but potential for further chemo (Gemzar/Taxotere……maybe ET742) as things develop. I was told by my thoracic surgeon that I'd be ok to dive 6 weeks after the lobectomy, although naturally, didn't dive during chemo (too weak, too much neutropeania!). However, since chemo finished, I've completed 30 dives, (max 38m) as well as my PADI EFR and Rescue Diver courses. My last thorax CT (3 weeks ago) was squeaky clean. I have pristine lungs (what's left of 'em), no bullae, and excellent lung function. The reality is that I'm likely to have further mets, and that this disease is going to kill me. But I'll be damned if I'm going to sit on my arse and watch it happen, so whatever happens, I WILL be diving again. However, to dive where I want to, with the people I want to, they have implied that I need a medical (purely because of the lobectomy), and I'm a little cautious about that. From what I understand, and my experience to date, I genuinely don't believe that I should be barred from diving (at this stage…different if I get more lung mets). Could you give me your opinion as to where I stand? I'm very grateful for your advice! ANSWER A sad tale. Well done for coping with everything thrown at you so far. A lesson to us all. QUESTION My boyfriend has recently been diagnosed with sarcoidosis, bit of a nightmare as we are divemasters and have flights booked to Thailand to do our instructor course.He has seen the specialist and his lung function tests are better than average, but he has a small amount of scarring on his lungs. He has never experienced any symptoms and we probably never would have known if it wasn't for a chest x-ray needed for Aus visa (which apparently we now can't have, but that's a different nightmare). The specialist has told him that it will probably go away and no treatment is needed, but the big question is can he dive? Your website is most helpful and your comments would be appreciated. ANSWER This is a funny old illness of unknown cause which is extremely variable in severity and duration. It gives rise to "granulomas" (small nodules of inflammation) in any organ, but most commonly the lungs and lymph nodes. Young adults of both sexes are typically affected, peaking in the 20-29 age range. The symptoms are often vague at first – fatigue, dry eyes, a cough, general aches and pains – the sorts of things young adults dismiss, so the diagnosis is sometimes delayed. As in this case, most sufferers are picked up on chest X rays or breathing tests performed for another reason. You see a classic shadowing on the lungs caused by big lymph nodes in the early stages, but this can evolve into more serious lung disease. And this is why diving might be a problem – our old friend pulmonary barotrauma. Active sarcoid can cause scarring or air trapping, predisposing a diver to burst lung. QUESTION I would like to know if you can give me some advice after having pneumonia and a pleural effusion. I went to A&E after breathing difficulties & coughing up blood (only small amounts in a tissue over 12 hours). I was kept in for 4 nights & treated with antibiotics (clinical presentation said pleuritic chest pain & haemoptysis) then sent home with a follow up appointment in 6 weeks. At this appointment I was told that I had a pleural effusion after an episode of pneumonia and had 660 mls of clear fluid drained from my right pleural cavity (ie. not from inside the lung). After a follow up appointment a couple of months later I was told that there was still fluid present but that they would like me to try and get rid of it naturally over time rather than drain or syringe it out.I was told by the non diving doctor that providing my fitness was OK then there would be no problem diving. Would it be possible for you to confirm this please? I currently only dive in warm water on holiday. ANSWER A pleural effusion is a potential complication of pneumonia, but one that will often clear up by itself (if the volume of the effusion is not too large). Just to get the anatomy clear (as you know I’m a stickler for these things), the pleurae are membranes that cover the inside of the chest cavity and the surface of the lungs, forming one continuous lining. The space in between the two layers usually contains a small amount of fluid (3-4 teaspoons or so), to lubricate the movement of the lungs against the chest wall with breathing. Normally surface tension holds the two layers close together, allowing the lungs to expand maximally. If 660 mls of fluid accumulates in this space it effectively squashes down the lung tissue, so reducing the surface area over which gas exchange can take place. So less oxygen makes its way into the blood, and if you factor in the increased work of breathing at depth, then it's easy to become dangerously low on oxygen in this situation. QUESTION I've been diving for 30-odd years and was a smoker until five years ago (I'm now 48). Unfortunately I think I left giving up a bit too late: I was diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) six months ago. The docs say it's mild but because I smoked for 20 years (an average of 40 a day) it's likely to get worse. I do wake up coughing and have to clear some fairly putrid-looking oysters (sorry) in the morning, but otherwise I'm pretty fit (still run and cycle to work). Can I still dive?ANSWER Your typical COPD case is picked up in those aged 45 or older, with a smoking history of at least 20 pack-years. (Pack-years is a quick way of estimating long term smoking exposure; one pack year is equivalent to smoking 20 cigarettes a day for one year, so in your case you have a 40 pack-year history.) Early symptoms such as frequent throat clearing, breathless on mild exertion and an irritating cough are often blamed on aging or lack of fitness. Progression to chest tightness and wheezing may take years, but other behavioural signs may appear first – avoiding the stairs in favour of the lift, taking longer to mow the lawn etc. |